
So You Can’t Afford: 2012 Porsche Carrera 911 S
400-hp 3.8-liter flat six
Price: $97,350
The inexpensive imitator: Chevy Corvette
Chevrolet’s Corvette has been competing with the Porsche 911 since it first landed on our shores in 1964. Back in the 1960s, the Vette would smoke the Porsche on any road—as long as that road didn’t twist. Today the sports car icons are much more evenly matched.

But Maybe You Can Afford: 2012 Chevrolet Corvette
430-hp, 5900-rpm 6.3-liter V-8
Price: $49,525
Both should hit 60 mph in just a tick over 4 seconds. The Porsche, with its endless new technology like the Dynamic Chassis Control, which replaces the traditional antiroll bars with active ones to get you around corners faster, would probably squeak out a quicker lap time on the track. But is the Chevy less fun? No way. In fact some would argue that with fewer driver technologies, the Vette might be the purer experience.
We’re not expecting to convert any lifelong 911 fans here. Behind the wheel, the Porsche is like a luxury coupe—the interior is gorgeous. The Corvette is as it’s always been: a bit down-market by comparison, especially with its thinly padded thrones. But if what you want is muscle and you don’t care much about the name on the back of the car, you could get the Vette and buy some very nice seats with the $47,825 you’ll save. In fact, you could almost buy another brand new Corvette.

So You Can’t Afford: 2012 Fisker Karma
402-hp (drive motors), 260-hp 2.0-liter turbo generator
Price: $96,895
The inexpensive imitator: Chevy Volt
Despite advancements in technology and a rebirth of the electric car, plug-in hybrids are still rare machinery on the streets today. There are only a mere handful for sale by large-scale manufacturers. The Chevy Volt may have been the one to break that ice, but it’s the Fisker Karma that wants to command the room. The Karma’s proportions are sensual and gorgeous, to be sure. And its powertrain will propel the sexy four-door to 60 mph in just 5.9 seconds.
But Maybe You Can Afford: 2012 Chevy Volt
149-hp (drive motors), 84-hp 1.4-liter generator
Price: $39,995
Both cars are plug-in hybrids. The Volt might be cool and techy on the inside, but it’s no luxury car. It is more efficient, though. The Karma was certified by the EPA for a 52-mpg equivalent. It has an electric range of 32 miles and returns 20 mpg when running on gas. The Volt returns 93 mpg-e, has a 35-mile electric range, and returns a fuel economy of 37 mpg on gas.
The Fisker will certainly be the more compelling vehicle to drive, and the one that draws the larger crowd. But the Volt is backed by one of the world’s largest and oldest auto companies — GM. And that’s comforting when so much of this technology is so very new.

So You Can’t Afford: 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
375-hp 5.0-liter V-8
Price: $78,835
The inexpensive imitator: Jeep Grand Cherokee
For more than 60 years, the four-wheel-drive world has been dominated by two brands — Jeep and Land Rover. Yet neither is stuck in the past. Oh no. All Land Rovers use intelligent 4WD systems, and Jeep’s brand stretches wildly from the rugged Wrangler to the compact Compass. But can the top models of each brand be compared fairly, despite a price gap of nearly $50,000? That’s why we’re here.
The Range Rover is more luxurious than the Grand Cherokee by far. The level of craftsmanship and materials on the inside of this British machine rival that of Bentley. The Jeep has moved a large leap forward in this department but, still, you can see where Land Rover’s money went.

But Maybe You Can Afford: 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
290-hp 3.6-liter
Price: $29,490
When it comes down to hard mechanicals, though, the two 4WDs move closer. Both ride on an independent suspension system. And the Grand Cherokee uses an optional advanced air suspension that mimics the pioneering multiheight system that Range Rover has used since the 1990s. Both vehicles use a 4WD system that can be tailored to suit particular terrains as well.
When it comes to towing, a properly equipped Grand Cherokee can move a 7400-pound trailer. The Range Rover beats that, but by just 316 pounds. Under the hood, the Rover’s V-8 matches up well with the optional Hemi V-8 in the Jeep. But while the $100,000, 510-hp Supercharged Range Rover is still geared for off-road use, the 465-hp SRT8 Grand Cherokee is the closest a driver could come to a Jeep hot rod. And it does so at just $55,295. So for the cost of one Range Rover, you could have one Grand Cherokee for off-roading and another one for the street.

So You Can’t Afford: 2012 Lamborghini Gallardo LP-560
552-hp, 5.2-liter V-10
Price: $202,000
The inexpensive imitator: Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
Before you start writing an angry letter, we know: There’s absolutely no similarity between a Mustang and a Lamborghini. The Mustang is a rear-drive muscle car, with a hot V-8 up front and a (cough) live axle at the back end. It’s a ruffian that gallops along on old technology. A Lamborghini is the very definition of Italian exotica. There’s a lightweight aluminum chassis, sophisticated all-wheel drive, and a scalding V-10 hanging out behind your head, ready to wail. It looks more like something developed at Area 51 than any machine Detroit could churn out.

But Maybe You Can Afford: 2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
650-hp 5.8-liter supercharged V-8
Price: $60,000 (est)
But the new 2013 Shelby GT 500 isn’t just any Mustang. Ford has boosted the power by a full 100 horsepower over the last one, up to a staggering 650. That’s even more horsepower than Chevy’s ZR1 Corvette. And though the Shelby weighs about 500 pounds more than the Gallardo, we’d suspect the two wouldn’t be too far apart in a drag race.
Here’s the most interesting part. The Mustang, according to Ford, will hit a clean 200 mph. The advanced, technology-packed Italian supercar will go only 1 mph faster. That’s some serious bragging rights for anyone who ponies up for this Mustang.



